Those who aren't involved in rescue or animal welfare on a daily basis often do not have the same insight into this issue that we do. They hear about tragedies on the news and are scared and horrified, and rightfully so - just as all of us are. They view pit bull advocates as a bunch of crazies that are protecting monsters that want to gobble up their children. The knee-jerk reaction is obvious - ban them! Problem solved! Who could possibly oppose keeping our communities safe? But what they don't see is that our goal is make our communities safer - for both people and animals. Humane communities are safe. Safe communities are humane. We've seen the source of the problem... and it isn't a dog.
There is a lot that we both agree on and ultimately, our goals are the same. We want our communities to be safe and the people that allow these tragedies to happen to be held accountable However, our organization and other police and animal control departments that we work closely with every day recognize that a broad based legislation and breed bans are counterproductive.
No one defends animal attacks or bites. We believe that bite victims should have the same legal recourse and protection under the law, regardless of what breed is responsible for the attack. We oppose Breed Specific Legislation, because regardless of whether is is a Pit Bull, golden retriever or Chihuaha, we believe all dog owners should be responsible and held liable for the behavior of their animals. However, we recognize that until people are educated about responsible ownership, humane and anti-dogfighting laws are strengthened, and the police have the power to enforce such laws - nothing will change, regardless of how many breeds are banned. The dog of choice for nefarious people will just change again as we've seen in the past (In the '70s it was Dobermans, in the '80s it was German shepherds, in the '90s it was Rottweilers. Now it's shifted to Pit Bulls).
So, we'd like to explain what exactly it is that Ambassador Pit Bull Rescue does, and how we approach the issues, in hopes you'll take our views into consideration and understand the far reaching impacts of a breed ban and anti-"pit bull" campaign. We hope that if all parties can see how much we agree on and work at fighting the problem at the source, we can do MUCH more good together than we would with conflicting campaigns, that ultimately have the same goal in mind.
Why it's impossible to ban "pit bulls"
The first problem with banning "pit bulls" as a breed is that the term "pit bull" does not refer to a specific breed. It is just a subjective description - a generic term most commonly used to refer to a group of dogs that originate from combining bulldogs with terriers:
It's basically become a slang term which has come to identify any short, muscular, big headed, short haired dog with cropped, rose, or semi-prick ears. Other breeds and mixes commonly but incorrectly identified as "Pit Bulls" include American Bulldogs, Bull Terriers, Boxers, Mastiff breeds, and other mixed breed dogs.
Not only does BSL separate families, flood shelters, make excuses for irresponsible owners, and perpetuate a stereotype - it only makes pit bull type dogs that much more appealing to people who get them to try to "look tough". We pull a lot of the dogs in our program from PG County Animal Shelter (where pit bulls are illegal and can't be adopted out) and what we and the shelter staff have seen is simply a shift to other large breeds and mixes - Mastiffs (Neopolitain Mastiffs, Bull Mastiff), Dogo Argentinos, American Bulldogs, Cane Corsos, Shar-Peis and Presa Canarios. So, the question is - where do you stop banning? Do we ban all large breed dogs? All hunting and sport dogs? The other problem with this is that these large, powerful dogs or any mix resembling such are often labeled "pit bull type" dogs. The average person also can't tell these breeds apart - even when they're purebred. So, you can see how many dogs get caught up in BSL identification. These aren't just shelter dogs-- they're dogs that are owned by responsible, everyday families
Breed Specific Legislation - Why it is ineffective
Any advocate could tell you all day why they chose to work with pit bull type dogs, so we will focus instead on explaining why we vehemently oppose Breed Specific Legislation (BSL). We could literally write a novel on this subject, particularly with our experience with this issue in PG County and Maryland, so we'll just provide links to information that we hope you'll take a look at and would be happy to discuss any statistics or provide more specific information about pit bull type dogs at a later time. The HSUS (Humane Society of the United States), does a good job summing up many of the reasons why we believe BSL is not an effective approach to dog bites and dog bite related fatalities HERE.
In 2003, PG County, Maryland also performed one of the most detailed studies to date on Breed Specific Legislation. They recommended repealing their own ban, citing it as expensive, ineffective, and impossible to enforce. (We have the full text, but easier to read broken out, HERE)
Who Supports Breed Bans?
DogsBite.org is not a valid source - while maybe long ago she may have started with good intentions of advocating for bite victims, her website now simply perpetuates media hype, spreads misinformation, and isn't supported by facts or scientific evidence.
Who Opposes Breed Bans?
Below are a few links to studies, including research by well respected organizations and case studies on municipalities that have enacted BSL and the outcomes:
A Community Approach to Dog Bite Prevention
American Veterinary Medical Association - Task Force on Canine Aggression and Human-Canine Interactions
Breed Specific Legislation E-Book
Animal Farm Foundation
Dog Bite Related Fatalities 2012/2011/2010/2009 Reports
The National Canine Research Council
Dog Bites: Problems and Solutions - A Dog Bites Policy Paper
Animals and Society Institute
The Pit Bull Placebo - Media, Myths, and Politics of Canine Aggression
Karen Delise
Press Release Following "Rufus" Best in Show Win
The American Kennel Club (AKC)
A Comparison of Visual and DNA Identification of Breeds of Dogs
Victoria Voith PhD, DVM, DACVB
The Role of Breed in Dog Bite and Risk Prevention
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Pit Bull Identification Study
Maddie’s Shelter Medicine Program, College of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Florida
Every well-respected national organization that is involved in canine/human interactions is opposed to laws targeting specific breeds of dogs. A partial list of these organizations (with links to their position statements) include:
American Bar Association (ABA)
American Dog Owners Association
American Humane
American Kennel Club (AKC)
American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA)
American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA)
Association of Pet Dog Trainers
Best Friends Animal Society
Center for Disease Control
Humane Society of the United States (HSUS)
International Association of Animal Behavior Consultants
International Association of Canine Professionals
National Animal Control Association
National Animal Interest Alliance
National Association of Dog Obedience Instructors
National Canine Research Council
United Kennel Club
The White House and Obama Administration
The list goes on.....
Here are a few more articles you might want to read (many hosted by NCRC):
Breed-Specific Legislation FAQ
Breed-Specific Legislation Fiscal Impact Calculator
Dog Breed Specific Regulation by Jane R. Berkey
AVMA-CDC Statements on Breed-Specific Legislation
New Study Explains Why BSL Does Not Reduce Dog Bites
Banned Breeds Are No More Aggressive Than Others, New Study Finds
Denver: Selective Counting and the Cost to Dogs and People
Miami-Dade County: No Positive Results
Miami-Dade "pit bull" ban remains, despite overwhelming evidence of failure and county officials' view
Sioux City Breed Ban Misses the Mark
World-Wide Failure of Breed-Specific Legislation
How Data Can Spare Dogs and Reduce Dog Bites by Dr. Karen Overall, Center for Neurobiology and Behavior, Psychiatry Department – Penn Med
Speak! or Rollover! The Choice Dog Owners Need to Make, by Karen Delise, American Dog Magazine (2009).
Aggression and Dogs: No significant difference found between breeds
"Pit bull" regulation not a basis for Dog Bite Prevention, AVMA experts report
Maryland's Experience: the Public Record & the Tracey v Solesky Ruling
Winnipeg, Manitoba far behind Calgary in community safety
American Bar Association (ABA) Urges Repeal of All Breed-Specific Laws
So What Works?
Responsible pet ownership and clear, enforceable laws --- which is what Ambassador Pit Bull Rescue, pit bull advocates, and our partners aim to achieve.
The basic building blocks of a responsible pet ownership community should include:
1. License and provide permanent identification for pets.
2. Mandatory spay or neuter pets (unless a prevented by a health condition).
3. Provide training, socialization, proper diet and medical care for pets.
4. Do not allow pets to become a threat or nuisance in the community.
5. Procure pets ethically and from a credible source.
Calgary, Alberta has had great success as a model responsible pet ownership community.
Interview on why they adopted this policy and results: http://vimeo.com/26979893
Humane education is critical and often overlooked as well. When people are raised a certain way -taken to dogfights as kids or their parents mistreated their animals - it perpetuates irresponsibility and a lack of empathy for people and animals. Sometimes they really don't understand that what they're doing is wrong. People that abuse animals are 5 times more likely to commit violent crimes against people - Dogfighting isn't a dog problem, it's a community problem. It brings drugs, gambling, weapons and sex crimes into our communities.
Adopt. Educate. Facilitate. Enforce.
On a daily basis we work closely with members of the community, local legislators, police departments, and shelters performing behavioral evaluations, providing input at round table discussions, and helping them develop best practices - So we not only have extensive experience with this issue, but behavioral testing, humane education, community outreach/support, and we have seen first-hand the repercussions on families and communities that breed bans have and how ineffective they are at combating the problem.
There is a HUGE problem which reaches far beyond the few articles you googled- and it's not a breed of dog (or dogs that share physical characteristics) that are to blame. A ban does not reach the source of the problem, because it doesn't identify the problem. Hopefully, the information that we have provided is useful and we can find a way to work together towards safer communities instead of at odds.
No one defends animal attacks or bites. We believe that bite victims should have the same legal recourse and protection under the law, regardless of what breed is responsible for the attack. We oppose Breed Specific Legislation, because regardless of whether is is a Pit Bull, golden retriever or Chihuaha, we believe all dog owners should be responsible and held liable for the behavior of their animals. However, we recognize that until people are educated about responsible ownership, humane and anti-dogfighting laws are strengthened, and the police have the power to enforce such laws - nothing will change, regardless of how many breeds are banned. The dog of choice for nefarious people will just change again as we've seen in the past (In the '70s it was Dobermans, in the '80s it was German shepherds, in the '90s it was Rottweilers. Now it's shifted to Pit Bulls).
So, we'd like to explain what exactly it is that Ambassador Pit Bull Rescue does, and how we approach the issues, in hopes you'll take our views into consideration and understand the far reaching impacts of a breed ban and anti-"pit bull" campaign. We hope that if all parties can see how much we agree on and work at fighting the problem at the source, we can do MUCH more good together than we would with conflicting campaigns, that ultimately have the same goal in mind.
Why it's impossible to ban "pit bulls"
The first problem with banning "pit bulls" as a breed is that the term "pit bull" does not refer to a specific breed. It is just a subjective description - a generic term most commonly used to refer to a group of dogs that originate from combining bulldogs with terriers:
It's basically become a slang term which has come to identify any short, muscular, big headed, short haired dog with cropped, rose, or semi-prick ears. Other breeds and mixes commonly but incorrectly identified as "Pit Bulls" include American Bulldogs, Bull Terriers, Boxers, Mastiff breeds, and other mixed breed dogs.
Not only does BSL separate families, flood shelters, make excuses for irresponsible owners, and perpetuate a stereotype - it only makes pit bull type dogs that much more appealing to people who get them to try to "look tough". We pull a lot of the dogs in our program from PG County Animal Shelter (where pit bulls are illegal and can't be adopted out) and what we and the shelter staff have seen is simply a shift to other large breeds and mixes - Mastiffs (Neopolitain Mastiffs, Bull Mastiff), Dogo Argentinos, American Bulldogs, Cane Corsos, Shar-Peis and Presa Canarios. So, the question is - where do you stop banning? Do we ban all large breed dogs? All hunting and sport dogs? The other problem with this is that these large, powerful dogs or any mix resembling such are often labeled "pit bull type" dogs. The average person also can't tell these breeds apart - even when they're purebred. So, you can see how many dogs get caught up in BSL identification. These aren't just shelter dogs-- they're dogs that are owned by responsible, everyday families
Breed Specific Legislation - Why it is ineffective
Any advocate could tell you all day why they chose to work with pit bull type dogs, so we will focus instead on explaining why we vehemently oppose Breed Specific Legislation (BSL). We could literally write a novel on this subject, particularly with our experience with this issue in PG County and Maryland, so we'll just provide links to information that we hope you'll take a look at and would be happy to discuss any statistics or provide more specific information about pit bull type dogs at a later time. The HSUS (Humane Society of the United States), does a good job summing up many of the reasons why we believe BSL is not an effective approach to dog bites and dog bite related fatalities HERE.
In 2003, PG County, Maryland also performed one of the most detailed studies to date on Breed Specific Legislation. They recommended repealing their own ban, citing it as expensive, ineffective, and impossible to enforce. (We have the full text, but easier to read broken out, HERE)
Who Supports Breed Bans?
DogsBite.org is not a valid source - while maybe long ago she may have started with good intentions of advocating for bite victims, her website now simply perpetuates media hype, spreads misinformation, and isn't supported by facts or scientific evidence.
Who Opposes Breed Bans?
Below are a few links to studies, including research by well respected organizations and case studies on municipalities that have enacted BSL and the outcomes:
A Community Approach to Dog Bite Prevention
American Veterinary Medical Association - Task Force on Canine Aggression and Human-Canine Interactions
Breed Specific Legislation E-Book
Animal Farm Foundation
Dog Bite Related Fatalities 2012/2011/2010/2009 Reports
The National Canine Research Council
Dog Bites: Problems and Solutions - A Dog Bites Policy Paper
Animals and Society Institute
The Pit Bull Placebo - Media, Myths, and Politics of Canine Aggression
Karen Delise
Press Release Following "Rufus" Best in Show Win
The American Kennel Club (AKC)
A Comparison of Visual and DNA Identification of Breeds of Dogs
Victoria Voith PhD, DVM, DACVB
The Role of Breed in Dog Bite and Risk Prevention
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Pit Bull Identification Study
Maddie’s Shelter Medicine Program, College of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Florida
Every well-respected national organization that is involved in canine/human interactions is opposed to laws targeting specific breeds of dogs. A partial list of these organizations (with links to their position statements) include:
American Bar Association (ABA)
American Dog Owners Association
American Humane
American Kennel Club (AKC)
American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA)
American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA)
Association of Pet Dog Trainers
Best Friends Animal Society
Center for Disease Control
Humane Society of the United States (HSUS)
International Association of Animal Behavior Consultants
International Association of Canine Professionals
National Animal Control Association
National Animal Interest Alliance
National Association of Dog Obedience Instructors
National Canine Research Council
United Kennel Club
The White House and Obama Administration
The list goes on.....
Here are a few more articles you might want to read (many hosted by NCRC):
Breed-Specific Legislation FAQ
Breed-Specific Legislation Fiscal Impact Calculator
Dog Breed Specific Regulation by Jane R. Berkey
AVMA-CDC Statements on Breed-Specific Legislation
New Study Explains Why BSL Does Not Reduce Dog Bites
Banned Breeds Are No More Aggressive Than Others, New Study Finds
Denver: Selective Counting and the Cost to Dogs and People
Miami-Dade County: No Positive Results
Miami-Dade "pit bull" ban remains, despite overwhelming evidence of failure and county officials' view
Sioux City Breed Ban Misses the Mark
World-Wide Failure of Breed-Specific Legislation
How Data Can Spare Dogs and Reduce Dog Bites by Dr. Karen Overall, Center for Neurobiology and Behavior, Psychiatry Department – Penn Med
Speak! or Rollover! The Choice Dog Owners Need to Make, by Karen Delise, American Dog Magazine (2009).
Aggression and Dogs: No significant difference found between breeds
"Pit bull" regulation not a basis for Dog Bite Prevention, AVMA experts report
Maryland's Experience: the Public Record & the Tracey v Solesky Ruling
Winnipeg, Manitoba far behind Calgary in community safety
American Bar Association (ABA) Urges Repeal of All Breed-Specific Laws
So What Works?
Responsible pet ownership and clear, enforceable laws --- which is what Ambassador Pit Bull Rescue, pit bull advocates, and our partners aim to achieve.
The basic building blocks of a responsible pet ownership community should include:
1. License and provide permanent identification for pets.
2. Mandatory spay or neuter pets (unless a prevented by a health condition).
3. Provide training, socialization, proper diet and medical care for pets.
4. Do not allow pets to become a threat or nuisance in the community.
5. Procure pets ethically and from a credible source.
Calgary, Alberta has had great success as a model responsible pet ownership community.
Interview on why they adopted this policy and results: http://vimeo.com/26979893
Humane education is critical and often overlooked as well. When people are raised a certain way -taken to dogfights as kids or their parents mistreated their animals - it perpetuates irresponsibility and a lack of empathy for people and animals. Sometimes they really don't understand that what they're doing is wrong. People that abuse animals are 5 times more likely to commit violent crimes against people - Dogfighting isn't a dog problem, it's a community problem. It brings drugs, gambling, weapons and sex crimes into our communities.
Adopt. Educate. Facilitate. Enforce.
On a daily basis we work closely with members of the community, local legislators, police departments, and shelters performing behavioral evaluations, providing input at round table discussions, and helping them develop best practices - So we not only have extensive experience with this issue, but behavioral testing, humane education, community outreach/support, and we have seen first-hand the repercussions on families and communities that breed bans have and how ineffective they are at combating the problem.
There is a HUGE problem which reaches far beyond the few articles you googled- and it's not a breed of dog (or dogs that share physical characteristics) that are to blame. A ban does not reach the source of the problem, because it doesn't identify the problem. Hopefully, the information that we have provided is useful and we can find a way to work together towards safer communities instead of at odds.
No comments:
Post a Comment