Friday 3 October 2014

Tips for Advocacy - Words Matter!

 
Picture

Words matter.  When we assign a label to a shelter dog or speak about "pit bull" dogs with the public, our words carry serious consequences.  We owe it to the dogs to examine the language and labels we use to describe them. 

There is no standard legal definition for "pit bull."  So, the use of that label, "pit bull", is arbitrary, subjective, and often randomly applied.

Approximately 50% of the 78 million dogs living in the U.S. today are mixed-breed dogs (2009-10 American Pet Products Manufactures Association survey).  

When labels are applied, correctly or not, it can mean the difference between life or death.  No dog should be discriminated against because of a label.  When a person calls a dog a "pit bull," or a "pit bull mix," that dog is now saddled with a label that might get him killed in a shelter that does not adopt out "pit bulls," or kicked out of a community with Breed Discriminatory Legislation (BDL). 

A label will stick with a dog for the rest of its life.  A label can mean discrimination, losing its home, or even death.  Labels are a problem for the dogs when shelter staff, or veterinarians (considered to be the local experts on animals), allow adopters, politicians, and community members to think that the label assigned can predict who that dog is or will be. 

Unless you are certain of a dog's breeding or heritage, please just call them a mixed breed dog, or better yet; let's just call them dogs. 
"There is so much behavioral variability within each breed, and even more within breed mixes, that we cannot reliably predict a dog's behavior or his suitability for a particular adopter based on breed alone.  Each dog is an individual."  Amy Marder, V.M.D., CAAB,  Director of the Center for Shelter Dogs, Animal Rescue League of Boston


(The above information was compiled from the Animal Farm Foundation website)
 
 
Picture
Sherlock, the Cambridge dog that started it all.
The Village of Cambridge, Wisconsin is a small, pleasant town on the border of Dane and Jefferson County.  The Village has a population of 1457 people.

Recently,  local residents and their adopted "pit bull" terrier, Sherlock, became the center of controversy between the resident's condo association, other condo residents, and the village board. You can read the background of the story by clicking this link.

At the August 26 council meeting the issue was discussed and a motion was made to remove the breed discriminatory language from the existing ordinance and send the ordinance back to be drafted with breed neutral language.  The motion passed unanimously.

Hats off to the elected officials in Cambridge.  They listened carefully to all of the testimony presented to them and made a decision based on fact, not misinformation.  ALL dog lovers can once again enjoy living in and visiting Cambridge.

You can see  the WKOW - Madison news story video from last night's meeting by clicking this link. 

 
 
Picture
The Village of Muscoda, Wisconsin, is best known as the "Morel Mushroom Capital of Wisconsin." The Village has a population of 1,300 and is nestled on the borders of Iowa, Grant, and Richland counties.

Recently, a local resident and "pit bull" terrier owner approached the council with concerns about their outdated Breed Discriminatory Ordinance. Other local advocates voiced their support. 
At the July 8 council meeting the issue was discussed and a motion was made to repeal the ordinance and recreate a breed neutral dangerous dog ordinance. The motion passed unanimously.

Hats off to the elected officials in Muscoda.  ALL dog lovers can once again enjoy living in and visiting the Morel Mushroom Capital of Wisconsin!

Here is a screen shot from the meeting minutes: 

Picture
Here is the proposed new breed neutral ordinance:
Picture
Picture

No comments:

Post a Comment